Navigating Marginality

Identity Construction and Resistance among GEMAPAKTI DIY

Authors

  • Eikel Karunia Ginting Duta Wacana Christian University Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32678/iseaes.v1i1.8

Keywords:

Identity Construction, Indigenous Religion, Marginalisation, GEMAPAKTI DIY, Youth Activism

Abstract

This study examines the identity construction of GEMAPAKTI DIY, a youth organisation for adherents of indigenous religions in Yogyakarta, Indonesia, within the context of persistent marginalisation. Despite constitutional recognition, indigenous religious groups continue to experience systemic discrimination due to the state’s exclusionary approach to religious diversity. Limited access to education, employment, and public participation presents significant barriers for GEMAPAKTI DIY members. Employing a qualitative methodology, this study utilises in-depth interviews to gain a comprehensive understanding of their lived experiences. Data collection prioritises informants’ perspectives, providing nuanced insights into identity formation. The data is systematically described, categorised, and interpreted, with theoretical frameworks guiding the analysis to ensure a structured understanding. The findings indicate that GEMAPAKTI DIY constructs its identity through internal consolidation, social media advocacy, filmmaking, and collaboration with NGOs and academic institutions. These strategies function as forms of resistance against structural and social marginalisation while fostering a sense of solidarity among young indigenous religion adherents. Applying Manuel Castells’ identity formation theory, this study identifies GEMAPAKTI DIY’s efforts as an example of “project identity,” whereby marginalised groups actively redefine their presence in public discourse. This paper argues that achieving an inclusive religious democracy in Indonesia necessitates systemic policy reforms, including bottom-up approaches, multicultural education, and full governmental recognition of indigenous religions. Cross-sector collaboration is essential to ensuring equal rights and opportunities, thereby fostering a participatory democracy that upholds religious freedom for all.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, A. N., & Izah, S. A. (2022). Dinamika hubungan antara agama lokal, agama resmi, dan negara. Mukaddimah: Jurnal Studi Islam, 7(1), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.14421/mjsi.71.2966

Adeney-Risakotta, B. T. (2018). Living in a sacred cosmos: Indonesia and the future of Islam. Yale University Southeast Asia Studies.

Bader, V. (2003). Religious diversity and democratic institutional pluralism. Political Theory, 31(2), 265–294. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591702251012

Bagir, Z. A., Ahnaf, M. I., Tahun, M., & Asyhari, B. (2012). Laporan tahunan hidup keberagaman di Indonesia (S. Cholil, Ed.). Center for Religious and Cross-Cultural Studies.

Bagir, Z. A., Dwipayana, A. G. A., Rahayu, M., Sutanto, T., & Wajid, F. (2011). Pluralisme kewargaan: Arah baru politik keragaman di Indonesia. CRCS UGM.

Bagir, Z. A., Hefner, R. W., & Ali-Fauzi, I. (2014). Mengelola keragaman dan kebebasan beragama di Indonesia: Sejarah, teori dan advokasi.

Banks, J. B., & McGee, C. A. (2010). Multicultural education: Issues and perspectives (7th ed.). John Wiley & Sons.

Buchari, S. A. (2014). Kebangkitan etnis menuju politik identitas (A. Bainus, Ed.). Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Castells, M. (2000). Globalisation, identity and the state. Social Dynamics, 26(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02533950008458682

Creswell, J. W. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Pustaka Pelajar.

Epafras, L. C., Kaunang, H. P., & Asri, S. (2019). Religious blasphemy and monitory society in Indonesian digital age. Jurnal Kawistara, 9(2), 220. https://doi.org/10.22146/KAWISTARA.41169

Gaudry, A., & Lorenz, D. (2018). Indigenization as inclusion, reconciliation, and decolonization: Navigating the different visions for indigenizing the Canadian academy. AlterNative, 14(3), 218–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1177180118785382

GEMAPAKTI DIY. (2021). Program kerja GEMAPAKTI 2021–2024.

Ginting, E. (2023). R-20 dan ambivalensi agama: Tantangan dalam merekonstruksi identitas agama. BONAFIDE: Jurnal Teologi dan Pendidikan Kristen, 4(1), 21–42. https://doi.org/10.46558/bonafide.v4i1.162

Haryono, S. D. (2023). Potret kelam moderasi beragama: Kondisi pendidikan penghayat kepercayaan di Jawa Tengah tahun 2020–2021. Academic Journal of Islamic Principles and Philosophy, 4(1), 115–133.

Hasan, A. Al. (2022). Gema Pakti berjuang untuk regenerasi penghayat kepercayaan. Persmaporos.com. https://persmaporos.com/gema-pakti-berjuang-untuk-regenerasi-penghayat-kepercayaan/

Hefner, R. W. (2019). Agama leluhur dan kemajuan besar demokrasi Indonesia. CRCS UGM. https://crcs.ugm.ac.id/agama-leluhur-dan-kemajuan-besar-demokrasi-indonesia/

Hefner, R. W. (2021). Islam and institutional religious freedom in Indonesia. Religions, 12(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/rel12060415

Kusuma, J. H., & Susilo, S. (2020). Intercultural and religious sensitivity among young Indonesian interfaith groups. Religions, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/REL11010026

Maarif, S. (2018). Pasang surut rekognisi agama leluhur dalam politik agama di Indonesia. CRCS (Center for Religious and Cross-Cultural Studies).

Maarif, S., & Asfinawati. (2022). Second essay toward a (more) inclusive FORB: A framework for the advocacy for the rights of indigenous people. Interreligious Studies and Intercultural Theology, 6(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1558/isit.24947

Maarif, S., Mubarok, H., Sahroni, L. F., & Roessusita, D. (2019). Merangkul penghayat kepercayaan melalui advokasi inklusi sosial: Belajar dari pengalaman pendampingan. CRCS UGM.

Nye, M. (2008). Religion: The basics (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Castell, M. (2020). The power of identity: The information age: Economy, society and culture. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003011590-1

Mueller, D. C. (2013). The state and religion. Review of Social Economy, 71(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2012.681115

Parvin, K., & Bagheri, M. T. (2020). The establishment and continuation of religious democratic system, manifestation of divine legitimacy and people’s acceptance. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(2), 461–468. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.02.88

Postill, J., & Epafras, L. C. (2018). Indonesian religion as a hybrid media space: Social dramas in a contested realm. Asiascape: Digital Asia, 5(1–2), 100–123. https://doi.org/10.1163/22142312-12340086

Appleby, S. (2000). The ambivalence of the sacred: Religion, violence, and reconciliation. Rowman & Littlefield.

Sen, A. (2013). The illusion of destiny. W. W. Norton & Company.

Smith, J. Z. (1998). Religion, religions, religious. Indiana University.

Lawler, S. (2014). Identity: Sociological perspective (2nd ed.). Polity Press. http://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/index.php/JKM/article/view/2203

Taylor, S. (2015). Identity construction. The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.wbielsi099

Widjaja, P. S., Wibowo, D. P. A., & Geovasky, I. (2021). Politik identitas dan religiusitas perdamaian berbasis Pancasila di ruang publik. Gema Teologika: Jurnal Fakultas Theologia UKDW, 6. https://journal-theo.ukdw.ac.id/index.php/gemateologika/article/view/658/348

Wijanarto. (2018). Mengurai masalah pemakaman publik untuk Sapta Darma di Brebes. In Praktik pengelolaan keragaman di Indonesia: Kontestasi dan koeksistensi (p. 332). CRCS (Center for Religious and Cross-Cultural Studies).

Yayasan LKiS. (2020). Aku siswa penghayat. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcbp10nmTL0

Yayasan LKiS. (2022). Pernikahan penghayat kepercayaan Sapta Darma. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tq97SWqmqWg

Downloads

Published

2025-06-17

Issue

Section

Articles