Indigenous Peoples as Legal and Psychosocial Agents

An Integrated Conceptual Framework for Postcolonial Southeast Asia

Authors

  • Vivi Sylvia Purborini Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang, Indonesia Author
  • Minggus S. Masela Universitas Wisnuwardhana Malang, Indonesia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32678/iseaes.v2i1.80

Keywords:

Indigenous Peoples of Southeast Asia, identity politics, legal recognition, psychosocial resilience, traditional ecology

Abstract

This article presents an integrated framework for analysing identity politics and traditional ecology among Indigenous communities in postcolonial Southeast Asia, viewing them as both legal subjects and psychosocial agents. Adopting a normative legal approach with sociological insights, it synthesises secondary sources. Identity politics is key to struggles for land, representation, and customary law. While UNDRIP offers hope, implementation fails due to bureaucratic and economic barriers, creating a recognition gap. We propose synergistic legal-psychosocial recognition, where legal acknowledgment coupled with cultural healing yields better outcomes. Traditional ecology underpins collective identity and resilience. Indigenous communities respond to modernisation via adaptive strategies combining legal advocacy, cultural revival, and ecological care. Identity politics bridges law and well-being amidst globalisation and state systems. We conclude that an interdisciplinary legal-psychosocial lens is vital for substantive recognition, casting Indigenous peoples not only as rights-holders but as healers and transformative agents.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Fatih, S., & Aditya, Z. F. (2022). The legal protection system of Indigenous peoples in the Southeast Asia (ASEAN). Proceeding of the Annual International Conference, Faculty of Law, Jember University (AICoLH), 1, 1–10. http://jurnalfh.unej.ac.id/index.php/AicLH/article/view/364

Bedner, A., & Saffanah, D. (2022). Legal recognition of customary rights in Indonesia: Towards a new legal pluralism? The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 54(2), 231–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2022.2049183

Brill. (2021). Moving past postcolonial: Rethinking indigeneity and self-determination in Southeast Asia. https://brill.com/downloadpdf/edcollchap/book/9789004466180/BP000015.pdf

Chua, B. H. (2017). Asian popular culture: The global village, globalisation and transnationalism. Routledge.

Goh, D. P. S. (2019). Re-politicising ethnicity, religion and race: Identity politics and new politics in Malaysia and Singapore. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 50(3), 348–372. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022463419000394

ICCAs Consortium. (2023, November 7). Southeast Asia: Challenges and ways forward. https://www.iccaconsortium.org/2023/11/07/southeast-asia-challenges-and-ways-forward/

IWGIA. (2024, January 24). The Indigenous world 2024: Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). https://iwgia.org/en/association-of-southeast-asian-nations-asean/5403-iw-2024-asean.html

Khoo-Lattimore, C., Mura, P., & Lin, L. (2022). Cultural heritage and digital storytelling in Southeast Asia. Tourism Management Perspectives, 41, 100942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2021.100942

Li, T. M. (2000). Articulating Indigenous identity in Indonesia: Resource politics and the tribal slot. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 42(1), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001041750000007X

Loh, K. S., & Wee, C. L. (Eds.). (2021). The Asia-Pacific in the post-colonial age: Reflections on power and culture. Routledge.

Mohamad, M., & Jalong, T. (2023). Indigenous education, identity, and environmental justice in Malaysian Borneo. Global Environmental Politics, 23(1), 144–166. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00643

Mukrimin. (2024). Identity politics in contemporary Southeast Asia. IDPS: International Dialogues on Population and Sustainable Development, 7(1), 1–16. http://siba-ese.unisalento.it/index.php/idps/article/view/26792

Mulyani, L. (2024). Traditional communities in Indonesia: Law, identity, and recognition. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde, 180(2–3), 292–294. https://doi.org/10.1163/22134379-18002009

Persoon, G., & Slikkerveer, L. J. (2011). Indigenous knowledge systems and local communities in Asia: Critical assessment and future directions. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-7-1

Pye, O. (2021). Unequal power: The politics of land and development in Southeast Asia. Zed Books.

Salazar, N. B. (2020). Local cultures and global tourism: Negotiating heritage and development. Annals of Tourism Research, 81, 102884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2020.102884

Suryakusuma, J. (2021). Postcolonial state and identity politics: Between co-optation and resistance. Asian Journal of Comparative Politics, 6(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1177/2057891120937205

Tauli-Corpuz, V. (2011). The Philippine Indigenous Peoples' Rights Act (IPRA) of 1997. In J. L. Corntassel, R. Singh, & J. E. (Eds.), Indigenous peoples, national human rights institutions and regional human rights mechanisms (pp. 200–213). Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.

The Jakarta Post. (2025, March 18). Indigenous peoples' rights: The ASEAN paradox. https://www.thejakartapost.com/opinion/2025/03/18/indigenous-peoples-rights-the-asean-paradox.html

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

Issue

Section

Articles